Investigative study reports the development of a caffeine-loaded niosomal hydrogel, suggesting improved drug delivery efficiency.
The aim of present work is to development and characterization of caffeine-loaded niosomal hydrogel for topical delivery. The stratum corneum significantly limits the effectiveness of conventional topical drug delivery systems. Vesicular carriers such as niosomes have emerged as a promising strategy to enhance dermal penetration and provide sustained drug release. The present study focused on development and characterization of a caffeine-loaded niosomal hydrogel intended for its antioxidant, lipolytic, and skin stimulating properties. Niosomes were prepared using a ether injection technique with different ratios of Tween 80 and cholesterol and were subsequently incorporated into a Carbopol 934 hydrogel base. Comprehensive characterization was performed, including particle size analysis, zeta potential measurement, FTIR compatibility studies, rheological assessment, spreadability, homogeneity, drug content, entrapment efficiency, and in-vitro drug release. Among the prepared formulations, batch CG4 demonstrated the highest entrapment efficiency (86.925 ± 0.165%) and was selected as the optimized system. The optimized niosomes exhibited a mean particle size of 448.1 nm and a zeta potential of -4.877 mV, indicating satisfactory vesicle stability. The corresponding niosomal hydrogel (NG1) showed desirable physicochemical properties, including pH 6.2 ± 0.58, viscosity 14235 ± 7.12 cps, excellent spreadability (17.963 ± 0.842 g·cm/sec), uniform consistency, and absence of grittiness, drug content (92.32 ±0.42). In-vitro release studies revealed a sustained release pattern of caffeine (81.9% over 12 hours), predominantly following first-order and Higuchi release kinetics. Overall, the development and characterization of caffeine-loaded niosomal hydrogel demonstrates strong potential as an effective topical delivery system for enhanced and sustained topical drug delivery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jakaraddi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: