PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Petroleum Chemistry1 citations

Halloysite-Supported Ru-Based Bifunctional Catalysts for the Hydrodeoxygenation of Guaiacol

View Full Paper
GZG. O. ZasypalovGubkin Russian State University of Oil and GasVKVladimir KlimovskyGubkin Russian State University of Oil and GasEAEgor S. Abramov

Key Points

  • The research aims to evaluate how different deposition methods affect the properties and catalytic performance of Ru-based catalysts on halloysite nanotubes during guaiacol hydrodeoxygenation.
  • Investigated various loading methods: incipient wetness impregnation, vacuum impregnation, microwave-assisted impregnation.
  • Characterized dispersion and location of ruthenium nanoparticles within the halloysite nanotubes.
  • Established optimal reaction conditions for guaiacol hydrodeoxygenation.
  • Achieved 100% conversion of guaiacol under optimal conditions.
  • Determined a turnover frequency of 278 h–1 for the Ru/HNT catalyst.
  • Observed a maximum selectivity of 6% towards cyclohexane, indicating low acidity effects.

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of the active-phase deposition method on the properties and performance of Ru-based catalysts supported on halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) in the model hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) of guaiacol. Among the loading methods tested—incipient wetness impregnation, vacuum impregnation, and microwave-assisted impregnation—the last provided the highest dispersion of the resulting ruthenium nanoparticles and their preferential location inside the lumen of the nanotubes. For the Ru/HNT catalyst synthesized by microwave-assisted impregnation, optimal reaction conditions were established: 180°C, 3 MPa H2, a guaiacol/Ru molar ratio of 200, and water as a solvent. Under these conditions, guaiacol conversion reached 100% with a turnover frequency (TOF) of 278 h–1; moreover, the selectivity toward the product of exhaustive HDO, cyclohexane, did not exceed 6% due to the low acidity of halloysite.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zasypalov et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e31f7340886becb653ea7fhttps://doi.org/10.1134/s0965544126600372
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper