PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Physiological Measurement0 citationsOpen Access

CDG-MACE score: an interpretable scoring model for risk stratification in emergency chest pain with normal ECG

View Full Paper
QSQinghua SunZhejiang International Studies UniversityCLChunmiao LiangUniversity of JinanTQTianyuan QiUniversity of Jinan

Key Points

  • To create and validate the CDG-MACE Score for predicting cardiovascular events in patients with normal ECG.
  • Developed a three-step framework including ECG dynamic analysis for repolarization abnormalities.

Structured PICO

Does the CDG-MACE Score improve prediction of 30-day MACE in emergency chest pain patients with normal ECGs compared to clinical variables alone?

P
Population
2836 patients with acute chest pain and non-ischemic ECGs across two independent cohorts (Cohort-1 n=2196; Cohort-2 n=640)
I
Intervention
CDG-MACE Score (interpretable scoring model combining cardiodynamicsgram features and clinical variables)
C
Comparator
Clinical-only model
O
Outcome
30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)composite

The CDG-MACE Score provides an interpretable and robust method for safely excluding low-risk emergency chest pain patients who lack typical ischemic ECG changes.

Limitations

  • Requires additional multicenter prospective studies
  • Requires fairness monitoring

Abstract

Rapid stratification of acute chest pain patients with non-ischemic ECGs remains challenging. We developed and externally validated an interpretable CDG-MACE Score to predict 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Approach: We proposed a three-step framework: (1) ECG dynamic analysis: using deterministic learning to model the ST-T repolarization process and derive cardiodynamicsgram (CDG) features that capture subtle repolarization abnormalities. We defined the Temporal Heterogeneity Index (THI) and Spatial Heterogeneity Index (SHI) as quantitative CDG. (2) Ensemble model: training an XGBoost classifier on eight pre-specified variables with five-fold cross-validation. Patient-level splits were used; only the first emergency department ECG per patient entered the model. (3) Score derivation: transforming the ensemble into a sparse, globally interpretable score via SHAP-based variable contributions. To mitigate the demographic influence, age and gender were included as explicit covariates, and the study results were prespecified to be reported stratified by age and gender in both cohorts. Main results: Calibration and decision-analytic utility were assessed. Two independent cohorts (n=2836) were included. In Cohort-1 (n=2196; 23.27% MACE), the ensemble model achieved AUC 0.8441. Adding CDG dynamics to clinical variables improved discrimination compared with a clinical-only model (AUC 0.7963-0.8221). The derived CDG-MACE Score maintained discrimination (internal AUC 0.8221) and generalized well to Cohort-2 (n=640; 11.09% MACE; external AUC 0.8219). Using prespecified cutoffs from the training set (low ≤ 9.52; high > 26.83), the internal low-risk group had NPV 99.22% and MACE 0.78%, while the external low-risk group achieved NPV 100%. Ablation analyses confirmed that CDG dynamics contributed independent signals beyond demographics. Significance: The CDG-MACE Score combines dynamic ECG modeling with a SHAP-linearized scoring system to achieve discrimination with global interpretability, enabling safe exclusion of low-risk patients without typical ischemic ECG changes. External validation suggests robustness and clinical utility; additional multicenter prospective studies and fairness monitoring are warranted. .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e31f7340886becb653eaabhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ae601a
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper