This investigation analyzes uranium isotopes' bioaccumulation and radiological risk in green mussels, indicating the need for careful monitoring.
Activity concentrations of 234 U and 238 U as well as 234 U/ 238 U ratios were investigated in the muscle and digestive diverticulum organs of ten size group samples of Asian green mussel ( Perna viridis ) from Binh Thuan, Vietnam by alpha-spectrometry, and radiological risk assessment was carried out. The 234 U and 238 U activities in muscle tissues and digestive diverticulum ranged from 1.4 ± 0.1 to 53.2 ± 4.3 Bq.kg −1 , from 1.2 ± 0.2 to 57.2 ± 4.5 Bq.kg −1 , and from 3.8 ± 0.3 to 45.0 ± 7.5 Bq.kg −1 , from 3.1 ± 0.2 to 42.0 ± 6.6 Bq.kg −1 , respectively. Uranium activities showed a decreasing trend in groups with smaller shell lengths from 5 to 6.5 cm and stabilized in individuals larger than 7 cm. Bioaccumulation factors were higher in smaller mussels, demonstrating greater accumulation, indicating their suitability as sentinel organisms for further study and radioecological monitoring of uranium isotopes. The 234 U/ 238 U activity ratios in digestive diverticula were consistently higher than in muscle tissues, suggesting dual uranium uptake pathways: direct absorption from seawater and ingestion of contaminated foods. The average risk to the mussels from exposure to uranium alone is below the ERICA screening reference level of 10 µGy.h −1 , but a single sample exceeded this level indicating further investigation is necessary. Annual committed effective doses from consuming mussels containing 234 U and 238 U ranged from 2.11 to 43.60 µSv.y −1 , with a mean of 12.04 µSv.y −1 . While doses from 234 and 238 U are within UNSCEAR safety thresholds, other radionuclides (e.g., Po, Pb, and Ra isotopes) should be considered for a comprehensive assessment. Not consuming small mussels is recommended due to higher potential radionuclide accumulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: