This research examines legal and ethical tensions surrounding AI's status as a legal person, highlighting implications for jurisprudence.
The rapid rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) from deterministic, rule-based computing tools to probabilistic, self-learning autonomous agents has created an unprecedented crisis in modern jurisprudence. This research paper examines the growing legal and ethical tensions around the proposed attribution of
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aditya Sharma (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: