Why the study?
DOX remains first-line therapy for advanced STS despite cumulative cardiotoxicity, and while PLD may reduce toxicity, survival comparisons between them in STS are limited.
Does pegylated liposomal doxorubicin improve survival compared to conventional doxorubicin in adults with advanced soft tissue sarcoma?
Does pegylated liposomal doxorubicin improve survival compared to conventional doxorubicin in adults with advanced soft tissue sarcoma?
Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and conventional doxorubicin demonstrate similar effectiveness and tolerability as first-line therapy for advanced soft tissue sarcoma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
May warrant PLD preference in advanced STS to avoid cardiotoxicity; extends limited evidence but leaves open randomized confirmation.
PURPOSE Doxorubicin (DOX) remains first-line therapy for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) despite modest efficacy and cumulative cardiotoxicity. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) may reduce toxicity, but survival comparisons in STS are limited. We performed a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study comparing survival and adverse events in patients receiving first-line DOX versus PLD. METHODS This is a retrospective study of adults with unresectable or metastatic STS treated with first-line DOX or PLD at two cancer centers between 2016 and 2024. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank testing and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Secondary outcomes, including objective response, treatment-related toxicities, hospitalizations, and dose modifications, were compared using Fisher's exact test. A post hoc sensitivity analysis was performed excluding angiosarcoma. RESULTS A total of 135 patients were included (91 DOX, 44 PLD). Baseline characteristics differed by histology, with angiosarcoma more frequent in the PLD group. Objective response rates were similar (DOX 8.8% v PLD 14.3%; P = .37), as were disease control rates (35.2% v 40.5%; P = .57). The median PFS was 2.1 months with DOX and 2.8 months with PLD, with no significant difference in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.50 to 1.12]; P = .15). The median OS was 12.4 months for DOX and 17.7 months for PLD, also not significantly different after adjustment (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.47 to 1.30]; P = .34). Rates of hospitalization, cardiac toxicity, dose reductions, and grade III to IV toxicities did not differ significantly between groups. Sensitivity analyses excluding angiosarcoma (n = 119) similarly showed no significant differences in response or survival. CONCLUSION PLD and DOX demonstrated similar effectiveness with no statistically significant differences in tolerability detected as first-line therapy for advanced STS.
Aleixo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: