Narrative review evaluates prenatal whole-genome sequencing performance for fetal anomalies, highlighting its complexity and clinical integration challenges.
Prenatal whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is a comprehensive genetic test for fetal anomalies, enabling simultaneous detection of aneuploidies, copy number variants (CNVs), single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), small insertions/deletions, structural variants, and regions of absence of heterozygosity. However, its clinical performance, optimal sequencing strategies, and implementation challenges remain incompletely defined. We conducted a narrative review of PubMed-indexed studies (1966–December 2025) evaluating prenatal WGS in fetuses with structural anomalies. Across 29 studies, diagnostic yield ranged from approximately 20% to 40%, influenced by phenotype complexity, sequencing depth, and study design. Low-coverage WGS (≤5×) reliably detected large chromosomal abnormalities with a performance comparable to chromosomal microarray analysis. Moderate-coverage WGS (20–40×) additionally enabled detection of SNVs and structural variants, providing up to 30% incremental diagnostic yield after uninformative standard testing. Turnaround times were typically 14–21 days. Higher sequencing depth increases detection of variants of uncertain significance (0.6% to 35.7%) and secondary/incidental findings (1.6–30.8%). Prenatal WGS offers meaningful diagnostic value but requires careful patient selection, multidisciplinary expertise, and structured pre- and post-test genetic counseling to ensure responsible integration into routine clinical practice, with careful consideration of clinical benefit and economic feasibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamlungkuea et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: