PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Foods1 citationsOpen Access

Rapid Optical Nanomotion-Based Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Kombucha-Associated Acetic Acid Bacteria and Escherichia coli

View Full Paper
MCMeritxell Moreno CórdobaVRVjera RadonicicSKSandor Kasas

Key Points

  • The aim is to rapidly assess antibiotic susceptibility in acetic acid bacteria and E. coli using optical nanomotion detection.
  • Evaluated kombucha-associated acetic acid bacteria and E. coli.
  • Applied minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing before optical nanomotion detection.
  • Monitored changes in nanomotion activity over time following antibiotic exposure.
  • Susceptible strains showed decreased nanomotion aligning with their MIC.
  • Chloramphenicol increased nanomotion initially but later suppressed it in susceptible strains.
  • ONMD distinguished between active and resistant bacterial profiles in real-time.

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance in microorganisms associated with fermented foods is increasingly recognized, yet rapid methods to characterize antibiotic response dynamics remain limited. This study evaluates antibiotic susceptibility and physiological response patterns of kombucha-associated acetic acid bacteria and motile Escherichia coli using optical nanomotion detection (ONMD), a label-free technique that quantifies single-cell mechanical activity. Two cellulose-producing species (Komagataeibacter xylinus and K. rhaeticus), one non-cellulose-producing species (K. melaceti), and E. coli were exposed to ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, and chloramphenicol. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined prior to time-resolved ONMD analysis. Susceptible strains exhibited progressive suppression of confined nanomotion consistent with MIC-defined susceptibility, whereas resistant profiles maintained sustained mechanical activity. Chloramphenicol initially induced persistent or increased nanomotion at 120 min; however, extending the observation to 180 min revealed delayed suppression in susceptible strains, demonstrating that bacteriostatic antibiotics require longer observation windows for accurate ONMD classification. In motile E. coli, ONMD revealed both intracellular nanomotion puncta and swimming trajectories, which were progressively attenuated following antibiotic exposure. These findings demonstrate that ONMD complements conventional susceptibility testing by resolving time-dependent suppression of both translational motility and intracellular nanomechanical activity at the single-cell level.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Córdoba et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e3209340886becb653fa31https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15081395
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A simplified version of rapid susceptibility testing of bacteria and yeasts using optical nanomotion detection2024 · 10 citations
  2. 2Single-Cell Nanomotion and Machine Learning for Parallel Bacterial Identification and Antibiotic Screening2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Automated Open-Source Optical Nanomotion Platform for Rapid Phenotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing2026
  4. 4Accurate and rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing using a machine learning-assisted nanomotion technology platform2024 · 25 citations
  5. 5NMR Based Real-Time Analysis of Exometabolites Decodes the Mechanism of Action of Antibacterial Molecules, Nanoparticles, and Materials2026