PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Effect of Vein Visualization Device on Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion Pain, Anxiety, and Cannulation Success Rate Among Patients Receiving Chemotherapy

View Full Paper
HSHAGER FATHEY SHAFEIKESASalwa Hagag AbdelazizESEMAD ABD ELMONGY SADAQ

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate how vein visualization devices affect pain, anxiety, and cannulation success in chemotherapy patients.
  • Quasi-experimental after-only nonequivalent control group design utilized.
  • Sample comprised 60 chemotherapy patients, 30 in each group.
  • Measured pain using a Numerical Rating Scale, anxiety with the State Anxiety Inventory, and analyzed cannulation success.
  • The vein visualization device (Pigeon Medical DVA30) was compared against standard methods.
  • 90% of the study group achieved successful insertion on the first attempt compared to 16.7% in the control group.
  • Significant reductions in pain and complications during insertion were reported (p < 0.001).
  • No significant difference in anxiety scores was found between groups (p > 0.05).

Abstract

Abstract Background: integrating vein visualization technology into oncology nursing practice contributes to improved clinical outcomes, including reduced pain, reduced anxiety level and higher successful insertion rates among chemotherapy patients. Aim: To evaluate the effect of using vein visualization device on (pain, anxiety, cannulation success rate) among patients receiving chemotherapy. Design: Quasi-experimental after -only nonequivalent control group design was utilized. Sample: A convenience sample of 60 adult male and female patients receiving chemotherapy for a period of six consecutive months, 30 in each group. Tools: the following tools were utilized in the current study: 1.Demographic and Medical Data Form (DMDF), 2. Adult Difficult Intra Venous Access (A-DIVA), 3. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11), 4. State Anxiety Inventory (SAI), 5. Success Rate Assessment Tool and 6. Vein Visualization Device (Pigeon Medical DVA30). Results: All participants in both groups received a 22-gauge cannula inserted in the hand (100%). 83.3% in the control group and 90.0% in the study group had severe insertion difficulty, there was highly statistically significant differences between the control and study groups regarding PVC insertion (pain, anxiety, and cannulation success rate) (p 0.05). Conclusion: vein visualization devices in PIVC insertion for chemotherapy patients is an effective intervention that significantly reduces pain, improves insertion success rates, but had no effect on anxiety levels. Recommendation: Future research with larger sample sizes should explore the integration of vein visualization devices within broader vascular access management programs in oncology practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

SHAFEIKE et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e3209340886becb653fafehttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19606358
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper