PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026The Accounting Review2 citations

Competing for Talent: Addressing the “Biggest is Best” Assumptions Through Small Accounting Firms’ Recruiting Practices

View Full Paper
KBKenneth L. BillsCHChristie HayneSSSarah E. Stein

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore recruitment challenges faced by small accounting firms and their strategies to attract talent.
  • Interviews with 34 stakeholders, including recruiting specialists and HR managers.
  • Development of a process model outlining small-firm recruiting phases.
  • Analysis of recruiting strategies and their effectiveness.
  • Small firms target specific universities and students to enhance recruitment.
  • Engagement in university recruiting activities improves visibility with potential candidates.
  • Firms balance imitation of successful strategies with their unique differentiation in recruiting efforts.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recruiting talent is a major issue for the accounting profession and is especially salient for small firms with limited resources and brand recognition. In this study, we examine the challenges small accounting firms face when recruiting from universities and the strategies they use to overcome them. Drawing on interviews with 34 stakeholders (primarily recruiting specialists and human resource managers), we develop a process model of small-firm recruiting and present evidence related to each phase: (1) targeting certain universities and students, (2) engaging in university recruiting activities, (3) extending offers, and (4) aiming to evaluate recruiting outcomes. Guided by theory, our findings reveal that small accounting firms develop organizational familiarity and image with students while navigating fatalism and balancing imitation and differentiation in their recruiting strategies. We conclude with a call to reconsider the “biggest is best” assumptions that dominate mainstream accounting research and provide suggestions for future research. Data Availability: Data were obtained from interviews. JEL Classifications: M41; M42; M51.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bills et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e3213840886becb6540741https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2024-0800
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1How Does Artificial Intelligence Shape Audit Firms?2024 · 73 citations
  2. 2Human agency in social cognitive theory.1989 · 7,520 citations
  3. 3Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology.1994 · 9,029 citations
  4. 4Modes of Interorganizational Imitation: The Effects of Outcome Salience and Uncertainty1997 · 1,274 citations
  5. 5Reputation, Diversification, and Organizational Explanations of Performance in Professional Service Firms2005 · 445 citations