PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Transactions in GIS1 citationsOpen Access

Uncertainty‐Aware Machine Learning Models for Flash Flood Prediction

View Full Paper
JSJaqueline A. J. P. SoaresASAllan K. S. SoaresLSLuiz Satolo

Key Points

  • The central aim is to enhance flash flood prediction accuracy by addressing input uncertainty in machine learning models.
  • Developed a public dataset of high-resolution flood hazard data for benchmarking.
  • Implemented an uncertainty-analysis method with synthetic noise injection to measure input uncertainty.
  • Created an uncertainty-aware ensemble model for providing probabilistic predictions.
  • Introduced three new metrics for assessing robustness and uncertainty propagation.
  • Evaluated five ML methods over 12 lead times with variations in input noise.
  • No single ML algorithm consistently outperformed others across all evaluation criteria.
  • Multi-criteria analysis showed variability in predictive performance and computational costs.
  • Probabilistic predictions improved understanding of uncertainty in flood forecasts.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Flash floods have intensified in recent years, and machine learning (ML) models are increasingly used for real‐time prediction. However, most ML‐based flood‐forecasting studies remain largely deterministic and provide limited evidence on how input uncertainty propagates to forecasts, compromising reliability for operational early‐warning systems. This study addresses this gap through four main contributions: (i) a public 5‐year high‐resolution flood‐hazard dataset for benchmarking uncertainty‐aware ML flood forecasting, (ii) an uncertainty‐analysis approach based on synthetic noise injection to evaluate input uncertainty propagation, (iii) an uncertainty‐aware ensemble providing probabilistic predictions, and (iv) three new metrics to quantify robustness and uncertainty propagation. Five ML methods (LSTM, MLP, XGBoost, LightGBM, NuSVR) were evaluated for 12 lead times with and without synthetic noise. Multi‐criteria assessment revealed no single algorithm consistently outperformed others in predictive performance, computational cost, robustness, and uncertainty quantification. All data and code are publicly available to support reproducible research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Soares et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e3215140886becb65408cchttps://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.70254
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper