Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An ideal material for C₂H₆/C₂H₄ separation would simultaneously have the highest C₂H₆ uptake capacity and the highest C₂H₆/C₂H₄ selectivity. But such material is elusive. A benchmark material for ethane-selective C₂H₆/C₂H₄ separation is peroxo-functionalized MOF-74-Fe that exhibits the best known separation performance due to its high C₂H₆/C₂H₄ selectivity (4.4), although its C₂H₆ uptake capacity is moderate (74.3 cm³/g). Here, we report a family of pore-space-partitioned crystalline porous materials (CPMs) with exceptional C₂H₆ uptake capacity and C₂H₆/C₂H₄ separation potential (i.e., C₂H₄ recovered from the mixture) despite their moderate C₂H₆/C₂H₄ selectivity (up to 1.75). The ethane uptake capacity as high as 166.8 cm³/g at 1 atm and 298 K, more than twice that of peroxo-MOF-74-Fe, has been achieved even though the isosteric heat of adsorption (21.9-30.4 kJ/mol) for these CPMs is as low as about one-third of that for peroxo-MOF-74-Fe (66.8 kJ/mol). While the overall C₂H₆/C₂H₄ separation potentials have not yet surpassed peroxo-MOF-74-Fe, these robust CPMs exhibit outstanding properties including high thermal stability (up to 450 °C) and aqueous stability, low regeneration energy, and a high degree of chemical and geometrical tunability within the same isoreticular framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: