PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026Endocrine Related Cancer1 citations

Predictive model for the diagnosis of Ectopic Cushing Syndrome

View Full Paper
WMWilfredo Antonio Rivera MartínezCBCarlos Esteban Builes-MontañoNHNatalia Aristizábal Henao

Key Points

  • The aim is to create a diagnostic model to differentiate ectopic ACTH secretion from Cushing's disease using routine clinical data.
  • Developed a multivariable logistic regression model with LASSO using a Spanish cohort.
  • Conducted external validation in a Colombian cohort.
  • Measured model performance using AUC, calibration slope, and Brier score.
  • Identified four independent predictors: ACTH concentration, 24-h urinary free cortisol, serum potassium, and tumor diameter.
  • Final model showed excellent discrimination (mean AUC of 0.987) in the derivation cohort.
  • External validation achieved robustness with AUC ranging from 0.9885 to 0.9890 and a high sensitivity of 95.3%.

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to develop and externally validate a multivariable diagnostic model to distinguish ectopic ACTH secretion (EAS) from Cushing's disease (CD) using routine clinical parameters. The model was derived from a Spanish multicenter retrospective cohort and externally validated in a Colombian cohort. Predictors were selected through a multivariable logistic regression model with penalized logistic regression (LASSO) using the Spanish cohort. Discriminative performance was assessed using the area under the ROC curve AUC and calibration using the slope, the origin, and the Brier score. The derivation cohort included 253 patients from Spain (199 with CD and 54 with EAS). The external validation cohort comprised 72 Colombian patients (53 with CD and 19 with EAS). In the derivation cohort, multivariable modelling identified four independent predictors: ACTH concentration, 24-h urinary free cortisol (UFC), serum potassium, and maximum pituitary tumor diameter. The final model demonstrated good discrimination in the derivation cohort (mean AUC of 0.987), with excellent calibration (calibration slope ranged from 0.998 to 5.22, intercept -0.2 to 0.99, Brier score 0.035). In external validation, model performance remained robust (AUC ranging from 0.9885 to 0.9890; Brier score 0.0381). The model achieved a sensitivity of 95.3%, specificity of 93.6%, positive predictive value of 82.3%, and negative predictive value of 98.7% for detecting EAS. Thus, the diagnostic model developed, based on routinely available clinical variables, shows high accuracy and calibration in differentiating between EAS and CD, supporting its potential use in diverse clinical settings and integration into diagnostic workflows.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Martínez et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e470a4010ef96374d8d8f9https://doi.org/10.1530/erc-25-0348
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper