Textual criticism investigates authenticity in Euripides' Andromache, suggesting new interpretations of the lines.
Lines 397–98 of Euripides’ Andromache have often been considered an interpolation and have therefore been emended, transposed, or athetized by editors. This paper reexamines the textual issues surrounding these two lines and argues in favor of their authenticity and traditional form, offering a new interpretation of their meaning within the broader discursive context in which they appear.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luca Valle Salazar (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: