Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved flood risk assessment in Shenzhen, suggesting better urban planning strategies.
To accurately evaluate flood susceptibility in Shenzhen and support long-term flood control planning, this study develops a GIS-based multi-model machine learning framework. Nine factors—including elevation, slope, and distance to rivers—were selected, with multicollinearity ruled out via Pearson correlation and VIF tests. A balanced sample set comprising 741 historical waterlogging points (2020–2024) and equal non-waterlogging sites was constructed. In addition to comparing five base models (Decision Tree, SVM, Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes, LDA), the study introduces a voting ensemble for model integration and applies SHAP for both global and local interpretability. Key findings include: (1) improved predictive accuracy and robustness via ensemble learning (AUC = 0.8131), outperforming individual models; (2) flood susceptibility mapping reveals a distinct spatial pattern—higher risk in western coastal areas and lower risk in eastern mountainous zones—with 68.3% of historical waterlogging points located in high-susceptibility zones. The model is trained on waterlogging records from 2020 to 2024, which may not fully capture longer-term climatic or urban dynamics. This work directly supports sustainable urban development by providing a replicable framework for flood risk mitigation that reduces long-term economic and social vulnerabilities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: