Compares cytokine profiles in severe COVID-19 and septic shock, suggesting new treatment targets.
Background Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and septic shock are both characterized by dysregulated host immune responses. While similarities and differences in immune responses between COVID-19 and bacterial sepsis have been reported, direct comparative analyses remain limited. This study aims to characterize the immunologic status of patients with COVID-19 and sepsis through plasma cytokine/chemokine analysis, thereby providing additional candidates for immunomodulatory therapy for COVID-19. Methods We included patients diagnosed with severe COVID-19 or septic shock with lymphopenia, matched for age, sex, steroid administration, and severity. A total of 20 analytes were measured using Luminex assay. Results A total of 36 patients were enrolled. Plasma granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) concentrations were significantly higher in the COVID-19 group (5.3 pg/ml; IQR, 3.6–16.3 vs 0.0 pg/ml; IQR, 0.0–3.6; P = 0.010). Plasma interleukin-10 (IL-10) (0.0 pg/ml; IQR, 0.0–4.8 vs 28.8 pg/ml; IQR, 7.5–51.7; P = 0.003) and IL-15 (0.0 pg/ml; IQR, 0.0–0.0 vs 0.0 pg/ml; IQR, 0.0–5.6; P = 0.024) levels were significantly higher in the sepsis group. Firth logistic regression analysis showed that plasma IL-6, IL-8, and CXCL16 levels were associated with new organ support in the sepsis group, while IL-15, CXCL16, and IL-1RA levels tended to be associated in the COVID-19 group. Conclusion At day 7 after diagnosis, both groups exhibited active proinflammatory responses, but only the sepsis group showed prominent anti-inflammatory responses. The persistent elevation of GM-CSF in the COVID-19 group, even with steroid administration, highlights its potential as a therapeutic target and underscores the need for patient stratification in immunomodulatory trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: