Systematic review finds air pollution linked to increased risks of gastrointestinal diseases, indicating a need for public health interventions.
Gastrointestinal (GI) diseases represent a significant global health burden, and emerging evidence suggests that air pollution may be a risk factor. We aimed to review the epidemiological literature on air pollution and GI diseases and perform a meta-analysis. We searched original studies published as of September 20, 2024, which investigated the associations between long- and short-term exposure to particulate matter [diameter ≤ 2.5 mm (PM2.5), ≤ 10 mm (PM10)] and gaseous pollutants [nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), and ozone (O3)] and GI diseases. DerSimonian and Laird random-effects meta-analyses were conducted when at least two studies were available for a given pollutant (per 10 μg/m3 increment) and a specific GI disease. A total of 70 studies were included. Long-term exposure to PM2.5 was significantly associated with an increased mortality from all GI cancers [OR = 1.128; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.019, 1.248], with the strongest association observed for colorectal cancer (1.214; 1.061, 1.389). For non-cancer GI diseases, long-term exposure to PM2.5 was significantly associated with increased risks of duodenal ulcer (1.073; 1.057, 1.089) and irritable bowel syndrome (1.353; 1.222, 1.497), while PM10 was also linked to the latter (1.108; 1.012, 1.213). Meanwhile, short-term exposure, particularly PM2.5, PM10, and O3 was significantly associated with appendicitis hospitalization [(1.003; 1.001, 1.004), (1.017; 1.015, 1.019), and (1.001; 1.000, 1.003), respectively]. PM2.5 was also associated with peptic ulcer bleeding (1.006; 1.001, 1.011). Both long- and short-term exposure to air pollution, especially PM2.5, is associated with increased risks of GI diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: