Cross-sectional study investigates mental health factors in children in institutional care, highlighting implications for support.
There are 34 thousand children living in institutions in Brazil, a context that poses a risk to mental health, raising the need to investigate protective factors. Objective: investigate the prevalence of religiosity/spirituality and mental health (depressive and anxiety symptoms, hope, and happiness) in children and adolescents in institutions. Method: A cross-sectional quantitative study that invited all children aged 7 to 17 years in institutional care in Juiz de Fora (MG). A sociodemographic questionnaire, BMMRS (Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiosity/Spirituality), Subjective Happiness Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), Children's Depression Inventory (CDI), and Herth Hope Scale were used. Results: The sample consisted of 43 subjects (28 males), with a mean age of 13 years (± 2 SD). Most of the sample had moderate anxiety and indicative depressive symptoms. In addition, they had below-average happiness scores and high hope. There was a high prevalence of religion and spirituality. The mean scores were: 11 (± 5) for anxiety, with 56% (n=24) above the clinical cutoff point; 17 for depression (± 11), with 44% of subjects above the clinical cutoff point; 4.7 (± 1) for happiness; and 36 (± 5) for hope. On the values/beliefs subscale, 95% (n=41) agreed with the statement “I believe in a God who cares for me.” On the global self-assessment subscale, 76% (n=33) responded that religion and spirituality were important to them. When asked what was considered most important in their lives, 52% (n=22) answered God. Conclusion: children and adolescents in care attributed great importance to spirituality and religiosity in their lives, with a relatively high prevalence of hope and below average happiness, requiring attention to clinically significant scores of depression and anxiety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: