PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026Energies0 citationsOpen Access

Bridging the Policy Gap: A Dual-Perspective Techno-Economic Analysis of Rooftop Solar PV Viability for Self-Consumption in Bhutan

View Full Paper
KKKrishna Kumar KhatiNKNipon KetjoyTSTawat Suriwong

Key Points

  • Assess the feasibility of rooftop solar PV systems for self-consumption in Bhutan's unique energy landscape.
  • Techno-economic assessment using high-resolution hourly load data
  • Simulation of a 150.8 kWp rooftop PV system via PVsyst
  • Evaluation of three operational configurations: without export, with export, and with battery storage
  • Annual energy generation projected at 252 MWh
  • Self-consumption ratio estimated at around 60% without export
  • Net Present Value (NPV) improves from -$33,687.5 to $27,965.42 when enabling export
  • Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) varies between $0.0405/kWh with export and $0.0841/kWh with battery storage

Abstract

Bhutan’s hydropower-reliant electricity supply faces seasonal imbalances, with a winter deficit prompting costly imports from India at tariffs of up to 0. 09/kWh. Despite the estimated solar potential of 12 GW, PV deployment remains limited. This study presents a demand-driven techno-economic assessment of a 150. 8 kWp rooftop PV system for the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport using high-resolution hourly load data and PVsyst simulation. Three operational configurations are evaluated: self-consumption without export, self-consumption with export, and a battery energy storage system (BESS) introduced to mitigate curtailed energy. The system is expected to generate 252 MWh annually, achieving self-sufficiency and Self-Consumption Ratios of around 60%. Without export, the performance ratio (PR) is reduced to 51% due to significant curtailment, resulting in a negative Net Present Value (NPV) of −33, 687. 5 and a Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) of 0. 0682/kWh. Enabling export raises the PR to 85. 62%, improving the NPV to 27, 965. 42, the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) to 8. 07%, and the LCOE to 0. 0405/kWh. A 200 kWh BESS, sized based on surplus energy and nighttime demand, increases self-consumption and self-sufficiency to 75% and 73%, respectively. However, the LCOE rises to 0. 0841/kWh, limiting economic viability under current tariff structures. The results reveal a structural mismatch between prosumer-level economics and system-level benefits, underscoring a need for improved compensation and targeted policy support in Bhutan and similar hydropower-dependent systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khati et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e472d8010ef96374d8ec52https://doi.org/10.3390/en19081939
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper