Qualitative study explores risk assessment practices in industrial settings, indicating effective hazard identification.
Background: This qualitative study examined the best practices for conducting risk assessments in industrial environments, with a specific focus on evaluating hazards associated with conveyors. Five Certified Safety Professionals (CSPs) who managed facilities with conveyors in Iowa were selected. Each CSP brought a diverse educational and safety background, representing various industries and safety perspectives, with industry experience ranging from 13 to 32 years. Methods: Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with each of the five CSPs. Transcripts were thematically evaluated using NVivo (‘NVivo’ 1994) and a grounded theory approach. Results: The key themes in this study included hazard identification during routine, maintenance, and non-routine tasks (i.e., cleaning and troubleshooting), training of in-house employee auditors, utilizing cross-functional auditors, and industry safety standards. Conclusion: This study concluded that effective hazard assessments included trained employees for conducting assessments, cross-functional teams with a diverse range of knowledge, and customized assessments that reflect the best practices within their organization to assess conveyor hazards.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert Ridpath (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: