PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract CT150: Sintilimab plus cisplatin and nab-paclitaxel induction treatment for locally advanced borderline resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A single-arm, prospective, phase 2 study (NEOCRTEC2001)

View Full Paper
XZXin ZhangJWJiadi WuDWDeshen Wang

Key Points

  • The trial aims to assess the safety and efficacy of sintilimab combined with cisplatin and paclitaxel in treating borderline resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
  • Single-center, open-label, nonrandomized phase II design
  • Enrollment of patients with borderline resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
  • Induction immunochemotherapy with 2-4 courses followed by reassessment for surgery or chemoradiotherapy
  • 70% of patients were deemed resectable after induction therapy
  • 56% achieved R0 resection with a 95% confidence interval
  • Pathological complete response was observed in 18% of patients
  • Patients with R0 resection showed significantly better overall survival compared to non-R0 patients

Abstract

Abstract Background: The standard treatment for locally advanced borderline-resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (BR-ESCC) is still debated owing to insufficient evidence from clinical trials. An increasing number of clinical studies focus on investigating the use of immunotherapy in the treatment of esophageal cancer. This phase II trial (NEOCRTEC-2001) aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of sintilimab in combination with cisplatin and paclitaxel induction immunochemotherapy followed by surgery for BR-ESCC. Patients and methods: The NEOCRTEC2001 trial was a single-center, open-label, nonrandomized, phase II study. Patients diagnosed with BR-ESCC were enrolled in the study and initially received 2-4 courses of induction immunochemotherapy at first. The subsequent treatment, surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy, was determined based on reassessment by MDT. The primary endpoint of the study was the R0 resection rate. Results: From September 2020 to June 2024, a total of 50 eligible patients diagnosed with BR-ESCC were enrolled in the study. All eligible patients underwent induction immunochemotherapy as the initial treatment. After induction immunochemotherapy, 35 of 50 patients (70. 0%) were considered resectable, and 29 patients (58. 0%) underwent surgery. R0 resection was achieved in 28 patients (56. 0%, 95% CI, 41. 4 - 69. 1%), and 9 patients (18. 0%) achieved pathological complete response. AEs of Grade 3 or higher were observed in 8 patients (8/50, 16. 0%). Postoperative complications of Grade 3 or higher were observed in 6 patients (6/29, 20. 69%). Patients in the R0 resection group demonstrated significantly superior overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) than those in the non-R0 group (OS: not reached vs. 19. 84 months; HR 0. 26; 95%CI 0. 07-0. 95, p=0. 005; PFS: not reached vs. 19. 82 months; HR 0. 33; 95%CI 0. 10-1. 11, p=0. 02). Conclusion: In conclusion, the primary endpoint of this trial has not been achieved. Nevertheless, the treatment strategy of induction immunochemotherapy followed by surgery resulted in significant tumor downstaging and a significant pathological complete response rate. Patients who achieved R0 resection exhibited improved survival outcomes. Subsequent studies should focus on optimizing the management of toxicity associated with induction therapy regimens. Citation Format: Xin Zhang, Jiadi Wu, Deshen Wang, Zhiqiang Wang, Qiaoqiao Li, Chao Ren, Yuhong Li, Hong Yang. Sintilimab plus cisplatin and nab-paclitaxel induction treatment for locally advanced borderline resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A single-arm, prospective, phase 2 study (NEOCRTEC2001) abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts) ; 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86 (8Suppl): Abstract nr CT150.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e47376010ef96374d8f3f8https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-ct150
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Sintilimab plus cisplatin and nab‐paclitaxel induction treatment for locally advanced borderline‐resectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A single‐arm, prospective, phase 2 study (NEOCRTEC2001)2026
  2. 2Neoadjuvant sintilimab, albumin-bound paclitaxel, and carboplatin for locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective phase 2 study.2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Chemoradiotherapy plus sintilimab versus chemoradiotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (NEOCRTEC2101): A multicenter, randomized, phase III trial.2026
  4. 4The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant sintilimab combined with chemotherapy in resectable locally advanced lymph node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A real world study.2024
  5. 5Neoadjuvant sintilimab, albumin-bound paclitaxel, and carboplatin for locally advanced, resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: clinical study and mechanistic exploration2026 · 2 citations