PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026Respiratory InvestigationOpen Access

Diagnostic and decision-making disparities in precision oncology in thoracic malignancies with interstitial pneumonia: A real-world cohort study

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

YKYutaro KimuraNHNaozumi HashimotoTWToshikazu Watanabe

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

A real-world cohort study reveals disparities in biomarker testing and survival in thoracic malignancy with interstitial pneumonia, suggesting ongoing challenges in treatment planning.

Key Points

  • Evaluate the real-world effects of interstitial pneumonia on biomarker testing and survival outcomes in thoracic malignancy patients receiving systemic therapy.
  • Analyzed data from 1247 thoracic malignancy patients at a tertiary teaching hospital between 2016 and 2023.
  • Compared biomarker testing rates and survival outcomes between patients with and without interstitial pneumonia.
  • Calculated hazard ratios to assess the impact of interstitial pneumonia on survival outcomes.
  • Only 7.5% of patients had comorbid interstitial pneumonia (98 out of 1247).
  • PD-L1 testing rates were significantly lower in IP patients (63.3%) compared to non-IP patients (75.1%).
  • Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy was utilized in 12.2% of IP patients versus 29.3% in non-IP patients.
  • Comorbid IP was associated with worse survival, with a hazard ratio of 1.789 (p < 0.001).
  • No survival improvement was observed in IP patients after 2020, despite gains in non-IP patients.

Cite This Study

Kimura et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e4739a010ef96374d8f541https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resinv.2026.101426
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share