A case report reveals sustained remission in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma through SIRT and therapy combinations, indicating new treatment pathways.
Background: Sorafenib was the standard systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for over a decade, but has largely been replaced by immunotherapy–based combinations. Current international guidelines recommend atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+T) or durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Dur/Tre) as first–line regimens for unresectable HCC. In the 5–year update of IMbrave150, A+T achieved an objective response rate (ORR) of 30% and a 5–year overall survival (OS) rate of 19%. In the Phase III HIMALAYA trial, Dur/Tre produced an ORR of 20%. By contrast, single–agent tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as sorafenib or lenvatinib yield a median OS of only 10– 14 months. Median OS with locoregional therapies alone—transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT)—range from 8 to 24 months, depending on baseline tumor burden and liver function. Even among responders to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), only 40– 50% maintain durable responses; meanwhile, patients may also experience adverse events of varying severity, highlighting a substantial unmet need. Early–phase studies suggest that combining SIRT with systemic therapy can increase ORR to 40– 60% while keeping grade 3– 4 toxicities below 15%. Therefore, beyond survival, health–related quality of life (HRQOL) and treatment burden should be incorporated as key endpoints to evaluate the real–world trade–off between disease control and treatment burden. Conclusion: This case indicates that, even with traditional relative contraindications, such as a high lung–shunt fraction (LSF) and low tumor–absorbed dose (TAD), SIRT may still serve as an “antigen–release platform”, providing a foundation for sequential targeted therapy and immunotherapy, enabling deep remission in advanced HCC and creating conditions to maintain or improve HRQOL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: