Interdisciplinary analysis reveals power asymmetries in global payment systems, implying critical governance challenges.
Planetary-scale payment ecosystems have emerged as critical infrastructures underpinning the global economy; yet, their governance remains fragmented across technological, political, and sociological domains. This article presents a comprehensive interdisciplinary analysis of the technological architectures, geopolitical dynamics, and governance frameworks shaping global payment systems. Drawing on a systematic synthesis of academic and policy literature published between 2015 and 2024, this study examines three interrelated dimensions: (1) the convergence of blockchain, artificial intelligence (AI), and quantum-safe cryptography as foundational technologies; (2) the power asymmetries and geopolitical contestations among multinational banks, technology firms, and states; and (3) the diverse strategies for digital sovereignty, including central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), export controls, and regional initiatives such as Gaia-X and the Digital Silk Road. The findings reveal persistent gaps in interdisciplinary integration and regional representation—particularly regarding Africa and South America—while highlighting emerging trends in AI-driven fraud detection, programmable compliance, and self-sovereign identity. This article contributes a synthetic framework for understanding global payment ecosystems as socio-technical systems and proposes future research directions for building inclusive, resilient, and accountable digital financial infrastructures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Darwisman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: