Retrospective cohort study finds serum vitamin D levels predict disability progression and therapy escalation in early multiple sclerosis, suggesting its clinical significance.
Background Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH-D) deficiency is considered a modifiable risk factor for the development of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, its impact on the long-term clinical course and disability progression in early MS remains unclear. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study at the MS Centre of the University Hospital Ostrava, including patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) or relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS). Mean serum 25-OH-D concentrations over a five-year follow-up were analyzed in relation to clinical outcomes, including therapy escalation and a composite progression severity score (PSS) based on EDSS change and treatment escalation. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess independent associations, adjusting for age, sex, and baseline EDSS. Results A total of 106 patients (73 women, 69%) were included, with a mean age at treatment initiation of 32.8 ± 9.32 years. Higher mean serum 25-OH-D levels were associated with lower odds of therapy escalation (OR = 0.923 per 1 nmol/L; 95% CI 0.886–0.962; p < 0.001) and a more favorable disease course according to the PSS (OR = 0.892 per 1 nmol/L; 95% CI 0.848–0.937; p < 0.001). Patients with a favorable prognosis had significantly higher mean serum 25-OH-D concentrations compared to those with unfavorable outcomes (70.43 ± 13.99 vs. 56.07 ± 11.25 nmol/L; p < 0.001). Conclusion Higher mean serum 25-OH-D levels were associated with a more favorable disease course and lower likelihood of therapy escalation in early MS. These findings highlight the potential role of serum 25-OH-D as a marker of disease activity; however, given the observational design and the use of a study-specific composite outcome, the results should be interpreted with caution and confirmed in prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chudy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: