PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026Ophthalmology0 citationsOpen Access

Reference Standard for Validation of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Screening Algorithms

View Full Paper
ADAmitha DomalpallyECEmily Y. ChewMEMalvina Eydelman

Key Points

  • The study aims to establish a consensus-based reference standard for labeling age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in imaging for AI-based screening.
  • Conducted a modified Delphi process with experts using structured surveys.
  • Panelists assessed existing reference standards and imaging modalities used for AMD.
  • Consensus was defined using a 9-point Likert scale with statistical thresholds.
  • Consensus reached to adopt the Beckman Classification as the level 1 reference standard.
  • OCT was agreed upon for identifying key AMD features, scoring 8.5 to 9.
  • Pigment change detection and screening age thresholds did not reach consensus.
  • Referral criteria for neovascular AMD and GA received strong consensus with median scores of 9.

Abstract

Abstract –Purpose Artificial intelligence (AI)-based screening models hold promise for identifying individuals with undiagnosed age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in non-specialist settings. A standardized reference framework for image labeling is needed to enable consistent training, validation, and deployment of AI based screening algorithms.The goal of the present study is to establish expert consensus on image -based reference standard for labeling AMD Design Modified Delphi consensus study Subjects/ Participants: fellowship-trained retina specialists, ophthalmologists, AI specialists, and imaging specialists Methods A prespecified Delphi process was conducted using structured surveys . Over two rounds, panelists assessed opinions on existing reference standards, including the AREDS scale and Beckman scale, as well as imaging modalities such as color, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and autofluorescence. The surveys also evaluated imaging features of AMD, including drusen, pseudodrusen, and pigment changes, as well as referral criteria. Consensus was defined using a 9-point Likert scale, with predefined statistical thresholds for agreement. Main Outcome Measures Agreement on key elements of a reference standard Results Consensus was reached on adopting the Beckman Classification as the level 1 reference standard (median score 8; agreement). OCT use for identifying key AMD features, including drusen, GA, and CNV, also reached consensus (median scores 8.5–9; agreement). Pigment change detection did not reach consensus (median 7.5; uncertain), and screening age thresholds showed non-consensus (median 8; uncertain). Referral thresholds reached consensus, including urgent referral for neovascular AMD and non-urgent referral for GA and intermediate AMD (median 9; agreement). Conclusions This study defines a consensus-based reference standard for labeling AMD from images for AI based screening. These recommendations are intended to support consistent AI model development and evaluation, while remaining distinct from clinical practice guidelines.Introduction

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Domalpally et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e474b6010ef96374d902c4https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2026.04.013
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper