Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Longitudinal study explores age differences in social media effects on body image and anxiety in adolescent athletes, highlighting critical developmental vulnerabilities.
Introduction Digital media engagement centered on appearance has become ubiquitous among adolescents, yet its developmental trajectory and age-specific psychological impacts on young athletes remain poorly understood. This study investigates age-related differences in the longitudinal relationships between appearance-related social media use (ARSME), body dissatisfaction (BD), and competitive anxiety (CA) among Chinese adolescent athletes (aged 14–18) across aesthetic/weight-class and non-leanness sports. The developmental psychopathology framework was adopted because adolescence encompasses distinct developmental phases characterized by differential sensitivity to social-evaluative environmental influences, making a developmental lens essential for understanding age-specific vulnerability to appearance-focused digital content. Methods A 12-month, three-wave longitudinal study was conducted with 356 Chinese adolescent athletes (184 males, 172 females; 14–18 years). Participants were categorized into younger (14–16 years, n = 200) and older (17–18 years, n = 156) groups. Cross-lagged panel modeling (CLPM), random intercept CLPM (RI-CLPM), and multi-group analyses were employed, controlling for sport type (aesthetic/weight-class vs. other sports). Results Younger adolescents exhibited significantly higher levels of ARSME ( d = 0.26–0.37), body dissatisfaction ( d = 0.29–0.45), and competitive anxiety ( d = 0.24–0.30). Age moderated the ARSME → body dissatisfaction pathway (Δχ 2 = 5.28, p = 0.022), with stronger effects in younger ( β = 0.22) than older ( β = 0.13) athletes. Body dissatisfaction mediated 61% of the ARSME–competitive anxiety relationship in younger versus 30% in older adolescents. A supplementary sensitivity analysis decomposing ARSME into behavioral engagement and psychological investment components revealed that psychological investment showed a marginally significant prospective effect on body dissatisfaction ( β = 0.08, p = 0.066), while behavioral screen time did not, providing preliminary support for cognitive-processing-focused interventions. Effects remained significant after controlling for sport type. Conclusion Younger adolescent athletes (14–16 years) represent a critical period of heightened vulnerability. Prevention-focused interventions for younger adolescents should prioritize cognitive reappraisal training, metacognitive awareness skills, and functionality-focused body appreciation rather than mere screen time reduction. For older adolescents (17–18 years), interventions targeting performance-based social comparison and authentic self-presentation are additionally warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: