Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Survival analysis identifies a three-gene score predicting outcomes in bladder cancer, suggesting integrative risk assessment.
Background Bladder cancer (BLCA) is clinically heterogeneous, and conventional staging does not fully capture individual risk. Ribosome biogenesis (RiBi) is implicated in cancer, but its prognostic relevance in BLCA is not well defined. Methods Survival-annotated tumor transcriptomes from TCGA-BLCA were analyzed and externally evaluated in GSE13507. Tumor-normal differential expression was intersected with a curated RiBi gene set to prioritize candidates. Cox modeling with machine-learning–based strategy selection yielded a three-gene ribosome biogenesis–related score (RBscore). RBscore was evaluated for overall survival (OS) stratification, independence from clinicopathological variables, and integration with nodal status in a nomogram. Pathway enrichment, immune features, pharmacogenomic associations supported by molecular docking, and somatic mutation and transcription factor (TF) network features were examined. Signature gene expression was assessed in bladder cancer cell lines and paired clinical tissues. PRKDC protein expression was further evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results PIN4, POP4, and PRKDC comprised RBscore, which stratified OS in TCGA-BLCA and remained prognostic in GSE13507. High RBscore tumors were enriched for antigen processing and presentation and ribosome-related programs, and RBscore groups differed in immune contexture. PRKDC expression correlated with immune checkpoint-related genes including CD274, TNFRSF14, and TNFRSF25. Pharmacogenomic analyses nominated candidate compounds, with docking supporting putative binding. TP53 mutations were more frequent in the high-RBscore group. RBscore genes showed tumor-associated dysregulation in cells and tissues. Conclusion RBscore captures prognostic heterogeneity in BLCA and connects RiBi-associated transcriptional programs with pathway activity, immune contexture, and complementary pharmacogenomic and genomic features, providing a basis for integrative risk assessment and testable hypotheses for downstream validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: