Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analyzes counter-piracy cooperation network dynamics, revealing trends in governance resilience and institutional linkages.
Faced with the persistent and evolving threat of maritime piracy, strengthening international cooperation has become a critical priority for global maritime governance. However, the structural dynamics and long-term evolution of such cooperation remain underexplored from a network perspective. To address this issue, this study constructs a dynamic dual-layer counter-piracy cooperation network, comprising a bilateral cooperation layer and an institutional co-membership layer. The network is built by extracting state- and region-level cooperative interactions from official reports, joint statements, and organizational records from 2013 to 2024, and is modeled using a multiplex framework to capture both vertical and horizontal ties. Using cross-layer and intra-layer centrality metrics, the study analyzes the network’s temporal evolution. The results reveal a pronounced “Matthew Effect”, with a small number of core countries consistently dominating the network. Over time, key hubs have expanded from Southeast and South Asia to Africa and other global regions, indicating a trend toward increasing multipolarity. Analysis of structural vulnerabilities and key nodes shows a gradual convergence in network fragility, with the institutional co-membership layer demonstrating greater stability and stronger institutional embeddedness than the bilateral cooperation layer. Further findings highlight that certain countries have persistently played hub roles in counter-piracy cooperation. The United States demonstrates a balanced and diversified cooperation model, while countries such as China, Vietnam, Japan, and the Philippines follow a diplomacy-driven model. This research offers a nuanced network-based perspective on the long-term evolution of international counter-piracy cooperation and proposes policy recommendations to strengthen institutional linkages, reduce fragmentation, and enhance the robustness of global maritime governance against emerging security threats.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: