Exploratory analysis demonstrates dual-task walking enhances identification of gait responders in iNPH.
Gait change after cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) in suspected idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus is usually assessed during single-task walking. Dual-task gait assessment may provide additional diagnostic value, as both gait and cognition are commonly impaired in iNPH. We analyzed GAITRite gait data from 122 patients with suspected idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus before and after CSFD and from 146 cognitively healthy controls assessed once. Normal walking, working-memory dual-task walking, semantic-memory dual-task walking, and fast walking were examined. Eight parameters were analyzed across single- and dual-task conditions; fast walking was used to derive gait speed reserve. Exploratory responder analyses defined response per parameter as improvement ≥75th percentile of within-sample change and an absolute change ≥10% of the baseline group mean. Two sensitivity analyses applied combinations of lower and higher thresholds. Compared with controls, patients showed gait impairment across most parameters and walking conditions. After CSFD, most parameters improved, and gait velocity showed the largest within-condition standardized effect size. Pre-post effects were generally largest during normal walking. Under the primary responder model, 84 patients responded during normal walking, 85 during the working-memory dual-task, and 72 during the semantic-memory dual-task; 43 responded in all three conditions and 9 in none. Importantly, 25.7% of responders were identified only through dual-task conditions, while under the stricter model, 45.3% of responders would have been missed by normal walking alone. Normal walking captured the largest average gait changes after CSFD, but dual-task assessment added individual-level diagnostic information by identifying responders missed by normal walking. • Normal walking showed the largest average pre-post gait effects after cerebrospinal fluid drainage. • Under the primary responder model, 29 of 113 responders (25.7%) were identified only through dual-task gait assessment. • Under the stricter sensitivity model, 43 of 95 responders (45.3%) would have been missed by normal walking alone. • Dual-task gait testing added individual-level diagnostic information beyond normal walking alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sucker et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: