PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 20, 2026Journal of the American Chemical Society0 citationsOpen Access

Group 4 Metallocenes Supported on Sulfated Zirconium Oxide Catalyze Benzene C–H Borylation

View Full Paper
JZJie ZhangMHMita HalderYLYuting Li

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate the catalytic activity of group 4 metallocenes supported on sulfated zirconia for benzene C–H borylation.
  • Sulfated zirconium oxide (SZO) supports group 4 metallocenes (Ti, Zr, Hf).
  • Investigated catalytic activity with pinacolborane (HBpin) in varying conditions.
  • Measured turnover numbers and selectivity at different temperatures.
  • Cp2ZrMe/SZO achieved 332 turnovers at 0.16 mol % Zr and 86% HBpin conversion.
  • Zr showed greater selectivity and activity than Ti and Hf in the catalysis.
  • Chemoselectivity for PhBpin reached 82% at 24% HBpin conversion, outperforming neutral counterparts.

Abstract

C-H bond functionalization of arenes with boranes continues to be a challenge in catalysis, with late transition and rare earth metals shown to be catalytically active. In this study, group 4 metallocenes grafted onto acidic sulfated zirconia (SZO) are demonstrated to catalyze arene borylation with pinacolborane (HBpin). Catalysis studies at partial HBpin conversions (59-68%) using Cp2M(Me)/SZO (M = Ti, Zr, or Hf; Cp = cyclopentadienyl) catalysts reveal that Zr exhibits greater selectivity and activity than Ti and Hf. At 0.16 mol % of Zr, Cp2ZrMe/SZO achieves 332 turnovers at high HBpin conversion (86%), making this catalyst comparably active to previously reported Ir and Rh C-H borylation catalysts. At 160 °C, a maximum chemoselectivity of 82% for PhBpin was observed at 24% HBpin conversion. The superior activity of ionic Cp2ZrMe/SZO compared to neutral Cp2ZrMe/SiO2 demonstrates the borylation mechanism relies on the highly electrophilic, coordinatively unsaturated cationic sites stabilized by the weakly coordinating sulfated support. Furthermore, both catalysts significantly outperform their molecular analogues, Cp2ZrMe2 and Cp2ZrMeB(C6F5)4, suggesting that the support enhances catalytic performance by stabilizing the active species.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e5c2d003c2939914028c2ahttps://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6c01025
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Active Sites in a Heterogeneous Organometallic Catalyst for the Polymerization of Ethylene2021 · 39 citations
  2. 2Transition metal alkyl compounds as polymerization catalysts1975 · 71 citations
  3. 3Bromination of Enamines from Tertiary Amides Using the Petasis Reagent: A Convenient One-Pot Regioselective Route to Bromomethyl Ketones2013 · 7 citations
  4. 4A comparative study of the reactivity of Zr(IV), Hf(IV) and Th(IV) metallocene complexes: Thorium is not a Group IV metal after all2007 · 42 citations
  5. 5A Supported Ziegler-Type Organohafnium Site Metabolizes Polypropylene2023 · 8 citations