Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis predicts tumor necrosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing TACE, suggesting improved decision-making for treatment.
IntroductionWe introduce a standardized necrosis rate-percent reduction in enhancing tumor diameter normalized by baseline tumor diameter-with a threshold of ≥30%. This endpoint is derived from the mRECIST partial response criteria but is normalized to mitigate tumor size-dependent bias. A clinical-radiomics model was developed to assess necrosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).MethodsRetrospectively, 95 HCC patients undergoing TACE were included. Radiomics features were selected via LASSO regression, and clinical variables via logistic regression. Separate radiomics and clinical models were developed, and a combined model was constructed using multivariable logistic regression. The cohort was randomly split into training (70%) and validation (30%) sets, with all preprocessing, feature selection, and model training confined to the training set to prevent data leakage. Model performance was evaluated using discrimination (AUC), calibration, clinical utility (decision curve analysis), and a nomogram.ResultsFrom 1,316 extracted radiomics features, six were retained for Rad-score calculation. Key clinical predictors included hepatitis group, standardized viable tumor ratio, and vascular invasion. The integrated model achieved AUCs of 0.865 (95% CI: 0.768-0.961) in training and 0.853 (95% CI: 0.716-0.990) in validation (n=29), outperforming the clinical model (AUCs: 0.808 (95% CI: 0.695-0.922) and 0.666 (95% CI: 0.465-0.866), respectively). Decision curve analysis and calibration plots confirmed the combined model's superior performance.ConclusionThe radiomics-clinical nomogram, based on a standardized necrosis rate, may enable early prediction of TACE response, offering potential insights for therapeutic decision-making, risk stratification, and liver transplantation management. External validation is warranted before clinical application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: