Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article proposes a relational framework to compare charitable food provision in high-income countries, highlighting its role in poverty governance.
Charitable food provision (CFP) has become a central response to poverty in high-income countries. Despite growing scholarly attention, there is a notable lack of conceptual tools for the systematic comparison of CFP across different contexts. To address this gap, this article proposes a relational research framework grounded in field theory. It situates CFP at the intersection of three institutional domains: welfare systems, civil society, and the agri-food system. It then introduces three dimensions for comparative study: the diachronic (field emergence and consolidation), the synchronic (field structure, boundaries, and coordination), and the everyday life (recipients’ navigation of the CFP field). The framework offers a complementary perspective to existing studies by emphasizing institutional embeddedness, meso-level interactions, and survival strategies, while enabling systematic yet context-sensitive comparison. This article thus lays a foundation for future comparative research and invites further theoretical development that would advance understanding of CFP’s role in contemporary poverty governance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Filippo Oncini (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: