Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative study demonstrating reduced radiation exposure in lumbar spine surgery using O-arm navigation, suggesting a safer surgical approach.
Objectives: We aimed to compare the amount of radiation exposure that was produced during computed tomography (CT)-control versus O-arm control of pedicle screw placement during degenerative lumbar spine surgery. Patients and methods: Between November 2013 and August 2021, 358 patients (O-arm + neuronavigation) group (154 males, 204 females; mean age: 61.4±12.3 years; range, 40 to 84 years) who underwent spinal surgery were included in the study. All patients in this group underwent surgery with intraoperative O-arm CT and neuronavigation assistance. The control (fluroscopy + CT-control) group consisted of 124 patients (50 males, 74 females; mean age: 63.9±11.9 years; range, 49 to 72 years) who underwent lumbar spinal stabilization surgery for adult degenerative lumbar disease under fluoroscopy and postoperative CT-control. All data were collected retrospectively. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was employed to test whether radiation dose values exerted an equal distribution. Following the detection that these values did not distribute equally, a Mann-Whitney test was used to test the significance. Results: Patients operated with intraoperative O-arm CT and neuronavigation assistance did not require any revision surgery. Median radiation exposure per patient was calculated as 1108.4 and 838 mGycm for control (CT-control) and study (O-arm) groups, respectively. Mann-Whitney test revealed a significant difference in reduced radiation exposure with O-arm (z: –6.056, asymptotic significance (2-tailed) p<0.0001). We detected reduced levels with O-arm surgery in terms of cumulative radiation exposure. Conclusion: We advocate the routine use of intraoperative O-arm imaging and neuronavigation particularly in degenerative spinal surgery due to both reduced radiation exposure and providing more precise screw placement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sari et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: