The paper demonstrates a structural reduction of the Riemann Hypothesis to a positivity inequality, revealing analytical insights.
"A σ-Selectivity Framework via sech²-Weighted Curvature: Reduction to the Analyst’s Problem" presents a conditional, structural reduction of the Riemann Hypothesis (RH) to a single real-variable positivity inequality. The paper introduces a three-tier epistemic architecture: T1 (Unconditional): Establishes finite-dimensional algebraic results, notably the σ-selector QN(σ) T2 (Conditional on Standard Inputs): Bridges the algebraic framework to analytic number theory using the Parseval identity, the Riemann–Siegel formula, the Weil explicit formula, and Ingham–Huxley zero-density estimates. It shows that any hypothetical off-critical zero would inject a negative term into the Weil decomposition that asymptotically dominates the prime-side and tail contributions, forcing the functional negative. T3 (Open): Isolates the sole remaining gap as The Analyst's Problem: proving uniform non-negativity of the sech⁴-weighted curvature functional No proof of RH is claimed; the work instead delivers a precise conditional equivalence and maps the exact analytic hurdle required to complete the reduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jason Mullings (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: