This study examines how Indigenous geocultural values reshape geoheritage appraisal and management in three Indigenous territories in the Cerrado, Mato Grosso, Brazil: Tirecatinga, Irantxe and Utiariti. We compared a Western expert-led inventory with an Indigenous-led participatory process to identify implications for geoconservation and geotourism. Expert assessors applied a Reynard-style evaluation of additional values, scoring ecological, aesthetic, and cultural criteria using documented, tangible evidence. Indigenous assessors employed iterative discussions, non-structured interviews and consensus building; oral histories were transcribed and aligned with the same evaluation frame to enable comparison. Site rankings diverged between assessor cohorts. Experts prioritised waterfalls with strong scenic exposure and documented use. Indigenous assessors elevated spiritually and cosmologically significant locations, including Salto Utiariti, Ponte de Pedra and Salto Duas Irmãs, even where prior modification had occurred. Indigenous narratives specified temporal and sensory conditions for care, such as ceremony calendars, soundscape integrity, and attention to hydro-spiritual or geo-ancestral couplings. Communities also articulated pre-colonial and colonial histories that shape current landforms and uses, and identified prospective geoscientific, educational and geoeconomic values, including non-formal education opportunities and community-led geotourism. The comparison revealed a protection gap: inventories that rely on tangible records underweight relational values and can overlook sites not yet documented in archives or literature. Findings support including co-produced geocultural information in inventories and planning, and using visitation plans and community indicators to guide geotourism as a conservation instrument. The approach is transferable, provided Indigenous people define what sites may be discussed and how values are represented. Such participatory, Indigenous-led assessment can inform more precise zoning, access rules and management objectives within Eurocentric protected-area and statutory planning frameworks.
Peruzzo et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: