Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This framework predicts emotional states in individuals, suggesting personalized therapeutic dialogues for improving mental health.
This rising prevalence of mental illness has led to the urgent requirement for forward-thinking, smart systems capable of predicting emotional states and providing context-aware, therapy-based advice. Existing emotion recognition and conversational AI focus on static sentiment analysis or real-time generative conversation but do not predict future emotional streams or provide explainable, clinically safe interventions. For overcoming the above shortcomings, the paper proposes one integrating a Hybrid Markov Chain model with an LLM-driven therapeutic reasoning engine. The hybrid Markov model combines empirical and synthetic emotion transition data to predict realistic but adaptive psychological dynamics, enabling 7-day ahead forecast of emotional drift in a number of affective states, namely, Anxiety, Depression, Stress, and Severe Distress. Three prompt architectures Hybrid - Instruction and Roleplay, Hybrid + Few-shot, and Hybrid + Few-shot + Chain-of-Thought (CoT) were evaluated based on metrics including Empathy Quality (EQ), Forecast Awareness (FA), Reasoning Transparency (RT), Clinical Safety (CS), and Interpretability (INT). Experimental results indicate that the CoT-scoring model achieved an overall average improvement of 12.9 % in performance, almost approximating LLM responses with predicted emotion trajectories at the cost of clinical safety, which was kept above 90 %. The proposed framework enables predictive-driven, interpretable, and adaptive therapeutic dialogue, fostering early intervention, enhanced user trust, and personalized mental wellness treatment. Through the synergy of probabilistic emotional modeling and explainable LLM inference, this solution represents a new paradigm in predictive affective computing that harmonizes data-driven prediction with empathetic, explainable AI-mediated psychotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: