Abstract: - Conventional Reinforced Cement Concrete (RCC) framed structures are widely used in the construction industry; however, they require more time, labor, and materials, which leads to higher project duration and cost. To overcome these challenges, modern construction techniques such as MIVAN technology (aluminium formwork system) are being adopted in large-scale construction projects. The present study focuses on the comparative analysis of RCC structures designed using conventional framed construction and MIVAN structural system. The study involves planning, load calculation, structural modeling, analysis, and design of a multi-storey building using AutoCAD and STAAD.Pro software. All structural elements such as slab, beam, column, wall, and foundation are designed using the Limit State Method as per IS 456:2000 and other relevant Indian Standard codes. The structural analysis is carried out under various loading conditions including dead load, live load, and wind load, and the results such as bending moment, shear force, axial load, and deflection are obtained. Based on these results, the design of structural components is performed and compared for both systems. The study reveals that the MIVAN structural system provides higher stiffness, better load distribution, reduced deflection, and improved seismic performance due to monolithic construction and the presence of RCC shear walls. It also offers faster construction, better surface finish, and reduced labor requirement. However, the initial cost of MIVAN technology is higher compared to conventional construction, but it becomes economical for large-scale and repetitive projects such as mass housing. On the other hand, the conventional RCC framed structure provides flexibility in design and is more suitable for small-scale projects, but it involves more construction time and complexity due to the presence of beams and columns.
Satpute et al. (2026) studied this question.