Despite growing concerns about the emission of micro- and nanoparticles (MNPs) from plastic, very little is known about the temporal distribution of these emissions throughout a plastic item's entire lifespan. Our ignorance is even greater when it comes to the long-term fate of these highly persistent polymers during and after use, when emissions are deferred by decades. For the first time, we have developed a realistic framework that can accurately estimate the distribution of the total item's initial mass between (i) first (short- and medium- term) MNPs emissions, (ii) deferred (long-term) MNPs emissions and (iii) the part that is molecularly converted into carbon footprint (e.g. by incineration), using existing data and conservative assumptions. Temporal considerations relating to clothing, tyres, bottles and paint, reveal that plastic downcycling drastically increases the first MNPs emission and that the main source of MNPs pollution is the overlooked deferred MNPs emissions (e.g. during item's landfilling) while policy priorities focus on first microplastic emissions. • The plastic particle footprint tracks micro/nano-plastic emissions over item's life • Downcycling a plastic item increases short- and mid-term micro/nanoplastics emissions • The main source of micro/nano-plastics are deffered emissions from landfilling
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gontard et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: