Multicenter observational study examines 18F-FDG-PET/CT utility in detecting disease activity in VEXAS syndrome, indicating monitoring potential.
Objective VEXAS syndrome (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) is a recently identified adult-onset autoinflammatory disorder caused by somatic mutations in UBA1. It is characterized by heterogeneous inflammatory and hematological manifestations, making diagnosis challenging. 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging, which identifies metabolic activity associated with inflammation and malignancy, is often performed during the diagnostic work-up. However, its utility in VEXAS syndrome remains unclear. Methods We conducted a multicentre retrospective observational study of patients with genetically confirmed VEXAS syndrome who underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging. Clinical, laboratory, and imaging data were collected, and 18F-FDG-PET/CT findings were analyzed according to disease activity, myelodysplastic syndrome status and mortality. Qualitative 18F-FDG-PET/CT interpretations were based on local nuclear medicine reports. Results A total of 125 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans were analyzed in 66 patients. Bone marrow (83%) and lymph nodes (53%) were the most frequent sites of abnormal FDG uptake, with combinations of bone marrow, lungs, lymph nodes, and spleen being the most common patterns. Pulmonary (38%) and vascular involvement (11%) were also observed. The number of organs with abnormal FDG uptake was significantly higher in patients with active disease compared with remission (median 2 vs 1 abnormal sites, p< 0.001). However, 90% of scans performed during presumed clinical remission showed persistent abnormalities, especially in the bone marrow (57%). Conclusion 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging reveals frequent but non-specific abnormalities in VEXAS syndrome, with persistent bone marrow hypermetabolism suggesting subclinical disease activity. While 18F-FDG-PET/CT may have limited diagnostic utility, it holds potential for disease monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Betrains et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: