Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates phosphate recovery in digestate-derived effluents using modified biochar electrodes, suggesting a sustainable approach.
Selective phosphate recovery from digestate-derived effluents remains a technical bottleneck due to high background salinity and strong multi-anion competition. To address this, waste peanut shells were valorized into activated biochar and functionalized with goethite (α-FeOOH) to form a regenerable anode for membrane capacitive deionization (MCDI). When treating real anaerobic-digestion membrane-bioreactor (AD-MBR) permeate, the optimized 20 wt% α-FeOOH/BC anode achieved a phosphate enrichment factor of 11.46 ± 0.61 and selectivity factors ≥ 5.47 against major competing anions, producing a phosphate-rich concentrate of 695–790 mg L −1 . The process remained stable over 20 adsorption-desorption cycles, maintaining a desorption efficiency of 0.94 ± 0.03 and negligible Fe loss (0.59% of the initial Fe inventory). XPS analysis confirmed the mechanism involved reversible inner-sphere Fe–O–P complexation. The mean recovery-specific energy consumption was 9.07 ± 0.64 kWh kg −1 -P. Overall, this study establishes a sustainable waste-to-resource framework, demonstrating that α-FeOOH-functionalized biochar electrodes can effectively couple agricultural residue valorization with closed-loop phosphate recovery from complex digestate permeates. • Peanut-shell biochar supports goethite anode for phosphate-selective MCDI. • Phosphate selectivity (coefficient > 5.47) was achieved in real AD-MBR permeate. • Stable 20-cycle cycling achieved 94% desorption efficiency and 0.6% Fe loss. • XPS indicates reversible Fe–O–P binding with re-hydroxylation on regeneration • Competitive SEC (∼9.1 kWh kg -1 -P) supported sustainable nutrient looping.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: