⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

May 19, 2010The Angle OrthodontistOpen Access

Canine retraction rate with self-ligating brackets vs conventional edgewise brackets

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

The retraction rate is faster with the conventional bracket, probably because of the narrower bracket width of the self-ligating brackets.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

S. Jack Burrow (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e5e665e3767bdea67f8ad0 https://doi.org/10.2319/060809-322.1

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context:

1Effects of platelet lysate on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a single-center, split-mouth, randomized controlled trialThe Angle Orthodontist · Fri,
2Clinical comparison of different debonding techniques of clear aligner attachments: a single-center, split-mouth randomized clinical trialThe Angle Orthodontist · Fri,
3Do plaque-disclosing tablets improve oral hygiene in patients with bonded lingual retainers - a randomized controlled clinical trial?The Angle Orthodontist · Tue,
4Comparison of the effects of Hanks Herbst vs twin block following the removal of fixed appliances in Class II correction: a randomized controlled trialThe Angle Orthodontist · Tue,
5Dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of clear aligner mandibular advancement appliances versus Activator for skeletal Class II malocclusion: a retrospective clinical studyThe Angle Orthodontist · Fri,

More from The Angle Orthodontist

Comparison of three-dimensional scan and conventional indirect bonding methods for bracket positioning accuracy: an in vitro studyFri,
In situ comparison of thermoplastic and thermoset orthodontic elastomeric chains after 30 days of intraoral exposureFri,
Bracket transfer accuracy of two three-dimensionally printed lingual indirect bonding trays with different bracket frame designsThu,
Biomechanical impact of beveling design on extrusion of a maxillary canine and a maxillary first molar: an in vitro and finite element analysis studyThu,
Effectiveness of resin-modified glass ionomer vs composite bonding agents for orthodontic bonding: a single-center randomized controlled trialMon,