Key result
New multimodality imaging appropriate use criteria establish consensus recommendations for CHD follow-up care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“There is a paucity of guidelines in our field in terms of when to image, how often to image, and which modality to use. What needed to happen was for experts to come up with [a document] on the best way to follow these patients... As you can imagine, it's a massive project including all of congenital heart disease.”
May inform imaging selection in congenital heart disease follow-up; leaves open prospective validation of clinical outcomes.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
Journal, society, and media accounts. Useful signal, not independent expert judgment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sachdeva et al. (2020) studied this question. Multimodality imaging appropriate use criteria were established to provide consensus recommendations for the follow-up care of patients with congenital heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: