Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This study evaluated the correlation among clinical diagnosis, magnetic resonance imaging reports, and arthroscopic findings in 28 patients aged 8 to 17 years (average, 14.4) with knee injuries. Meniscal, anterior cruciate ligament, and articular surface injuries were evaluated. A highly positive correlation (78.5%) was found between clinical and arthroscopic findings. A highly negative correlation was found between arthroscopic and magnetic resonance imaging findings (78.5%) and between clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings (75%). In this series, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity data were much more favorable from clinical examination than from magnetic resonance imaging. Overall, magnetic resonance imaging diagnoses added little guidance to patient management and at times provided spurious information.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Carl L. Stanitski
Medical University of South Carolina
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Children's Hospital of Michigan
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Carl L. Stanitski (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69e6d09d879111a13f6ee343 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465980260012001