PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 21, 2026Journal of Environmental Management1 citationsOpen Access

Global flood risk dynamics and their coupling with sustainable development goals (2000-2024)

View Full Paper
QLQian LiYWYongping WeiRPRupesh Patil

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the relationship between global flood risk and disaster-related sustainable development goals (SDGs) from 2000 to 2024.
  • Developed a composite Flood Risk Index (FRI) using the hazard-exposure-vulnerability framework.
  • Utilized OLS regression and PELT algorithm to analyze flood risk and SDG data across 111 countries.
  • Evaluated long-term trends and identified structural changes in flood risk dynamics.
  • Flood risk has increased significantly, primarily due to hazard intensification, with R² values ranging from 0.64 to 0.93.
  • Only SDG 1.5.2 (economic loss) and SDG 11.5.3 (infrastructure disruption) showed significant negative relationships with flood risk.
  • Overall, a structural misalignment exists between global SDGs progress and effective flood risk reduction strategies.

Abstract

Global flood risk has intensified dramatically since 2000, yet its alignment with disaster-related SDGs remains unclear, limiting our understanding of how to effectively reduce it. This study develops a composite Flood Risk Index (FRI) based on the hazard - exposure - vulnerability framework and constructs comparable SDG sub-indicator scores for six disaster-related metrics. Using data for 111 countries from 2000 to 2024, long-term trajectories were evaluated via OLS regression slopes, and structural turning points were detected through a Pruned Exact Linear Time (PELT) algorithm for both FRIs and SDGs. Results show a persistent global rise in flood risk, predominantly driven by hazard intensification throughout the study period (R 2 = 0.64-0.93), while exposure and adjusted vulnerability exhibited weaker, phase-dependent associations, becoming more prominent in the mid-2000s and after 2019. Four phases of FRI evolution of an initial surge (2000-2005) (0.000177), global escalation (2006-2010) (0.000614), transitional stabilisation (2011-2018) (−0.000156), and mild post-stabilisation decline (2019-2024) (−0.000064) reflect shifts in the underlying risk structure. Coupling results reveal that only SDG 1.5.2 (economic loss) and SDG 11.5.3 (infrastructure disruption) show significant negative associations with long-term FRI trends, while most SDGs display no significant relationship with flood risk at the global level. A similar pattern is observed in within-country analyses, where only a few nations show (positive or negative) significant SDG-FRI relationships, mainly under the former two and SDG 1.5.1, like Namibia, Indonesia, and Algeria, implying a structural misalignment between global SDG progress and actual flood-risk reduction. This finding highlights the need to recalibrate disaster-related SDG indicators to better reflect hazard intensification, exposure dynamics, and the evolving socio-institutional determinants of flood vulnerability. • Patterns in self-constructed Flood Risk Index (FRI) combine hazard, exposure, and vulnerability for 111 countries (2000-2024). • Four distinct phases of flood-risk development and how SDG indicators relate to flood risk. • Despite rising flood risks due to climate change, the link between global SDGs and flood risks remains weak. • Patterns vary by country, but weak links are common, especially in smaller nations, aiding targeted disaster risk reduction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e7138bcb99343efc98d048https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.129595
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper