Derives the geometric ideal value of the fine structure constant using Möbius topology, suggesting new insights into particle stability.
We derive the geometric ideal value of the fine structure constant from Möbius n=3 standing wave topology, without any mass measurements or free parameters: 1/α_ideal = 24π²/√3 = 136.757 250 186... Relative error from CODATA 2018: 0.20%. The correction δ = 0.279 is derived in Paper III. ─── Derivation (two steps) ─────────────────────────────── Step 1 — Wave-particle threshold E/f² = 4π² The Möbius stability condition λ/A = √3 (Schwartz 2024, arXiv:2308.12641) gives the minimum aspect ratio for smooth Möbius embedding. Combined with A² = E/(2πf)², this yields the wave-particle threshold: E/f² = 4π² ≈ 39.48 This is the MAXIMUM energy-frequency ratio for a stable Möbius standing wave. Above this threshold, the aspect ratio λ/A drops below √3, smooth embedding fails, and the fermion must emit a boson to restore stability. The electron sits precisely at this threshold. Step 2 — Threshold fixes the Möbius circumference At the threshold, λ = √3 — the circumference of the equilateral triangle Möbius band (Schwartz 2024, the tightest stable Möbius configuration). The outer double-twist boundary has circumference 2√3. Therefore: 1/α_ideal = 4π² × 2√3 = 24π²/√3 The three factors: • 4π: Möbius double-circuit holonomy (720°) • 1/cos(30°) = 2/√3: equilateral triangle projection (Schwartz 2024) • 3π: three-node phase bandwidth (n=3 mode) ─── What this derivation does NOT use ─────────────────── - No particle masses (mₑ, mₚ, quark masses)- No coupling constants- No free parameters- No dimensional quantities The result is determined entirely by topology (π, √3). ─── Series information ────────────────────────────────── Paper II of III. Published simultaneously with:- Paper I: Overview and main result (1/α = 137.035 999 121, 14.9 ppb)- Paper III: Mass ratio correction and quantum oscillation (mₑ/mₚ and e)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng Yan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: