PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 22, 2026Processes0 citationsOpen Access

Data-Driven Multi-Mode Time–Cost Trade-Off Optimization for Construction Project Scheduling Using LightGBM

View Full Paper
SJShike JiaChina Three Gorges Corporation (China)CLCuinan LuoChina Three Gorges Corporation (China)RWRuchen WangChina Three Gorges University

Key Points

  • The research aims to enhance scheduling in construction projects by optimizing time and cost trade-offs dynamically.
  • Developed a predict-optimize-update framework utilizing LightGBM for predicting duration and direct costs.
  • Implemented a mixed-integer linear program to minimize project makespan and total costs based on predicted data.
  • Validated the methodology against a dataset of 25 completed infrastructure projects covering 5258 activity-mode samples.
  • Achieved a mean absolute error of 2.7 days for duration prediction with an R2 of 0.89.
  • Demonstrated a mean absolute error of 7.4 × 10^4 CNY for direct-cost prediction with an R2 of 0.91.
  • The generated Pareto set showed diminishing returns, reducing total cost from 45.10 to 40.27 million CNY with increased project duration.

Abstract

Large infrastructure projects frequently experience schedule slippage and cost escalation; however, time–cost planning still relies on expert-assigned activity parameters that fail to reflect the variability induced by construction modes, resource supply, and on-site conditions. This study focuses on activity-level multi-mode time–cost trade-off planning and its dynamic correction during project execution. The proposed methodology is intended for project-level short-term operational scheduling and rolling re-scheduling within a finite project execution horizon, rather than long-term strategic or portfolio-level scheduling. A predict–optimize–update framework is proposed, where light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) is employed to predict the duration and direct cost of activity–mode pairs using unified features extracted from BIM/IFC records, schedule-resource ledgers, and cost-settlement data, covering engineering quantities, mode and resource decisions, and contextual factors. These predicted parameters are then fed into a time-indexed bi-objective mixed-integer linear program (MILP), which minimizes both project makespan and total cost (including indirect cost) to generate an interpretable Pareto frontier via a weighted-sum approach. Meanwhile, real-time monitoring updates refresh the predictors and re-solve the remaining project network to ensure dynamic adaptability. Validated on a desensitized proprietary enterprise multi-source dataset comprising 25 completed infrastructure projects and 5258 activity–mode samples, the proposed method achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.7 days and a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.89 for duration prediction, as well as an MAE of 7.4 × 104 CNY and an R2 of 0.91 for direct-cost prediction. The generated Pareto set exhibits a diminishing return trend: as the project duration is relaxed from 101 to 146 days, the total cost decreases from 45.10 to 40.27 million CNY. A weather-triggered update case demonstrates that the completion forecast is revised from 133 to 128 days, with the total cost reduced from 53.05 to 52.75 million CNY. This framework enables explainable schedule–cost co-control, thereby effectively aiding decision-making for the planning and control of large infrastructure projects.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jia et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e865126e0dea528dde9a50https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14081311
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Construction cost prediction for small-to-medium datasets using Bayesian optimization and multi-task learning2026
  2. 2Optimization of Schedule Management for Small Municipal Engineering Projects2025
  3. 3Time–cost combined optimization in planning infrastructure construction projects under environment induced time‐window constraints2025
  4. 4Stochastic Risk-Aware Time–Cost Optimization of Construction Schedules Using a Hybrid GA–GWO Algorithm with Integer Crash-Day Decisions2026
  5. 5Improved genetic algorithm for multimode resource-constrained project scheduling considering carbon emission allowances2026