Mixed-methods study explores low adoption of AI in clinical settings, suggesting significant awareness and training gaps.
Background: Doctors have made increasing use of artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support systems in recent years in eastern China, but far less so in poorer western China, where hospitals with less access to specialized expert services might be expected to make greater use of such aids. Methods: This study of the reasons for lower uptake in the western hospitals focused on a tertiary referral hospital in the capital city of the poorest province in China. Drawing on UTAUT (unified theory of acceptance and use of technology) theoretical literature and previous studies, seven variables most likely to explain the limited adoption of the technology were identified and tested by means of an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study. Results: Initial bivariate tests revealed no significant differences across variables; however, multivariate logistic regression identified social influence as the sole statistically significant predictor of adoption willingness. Follow-up structured interviews revealed a surprisingly low awareness of the technology by medical personnel, with very limited deployment. Conclusions: The failure to adopt AI diagnosis technology is attributable not to the variables usually cited as factors inhibiting technology adoption but rather the failure of hospital and medical faculty administrators to acquire the technology and train doctors and medical students.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: