Key result
Ultrasonography yields ~17% smaller Achilles tendon thickness measurements than radiography but identifies more thickening cases.
Why the study?
Does ultrasonography compared to soft X-ray radiography show diagnostic concordance for Achilles tendon thickening in patients with coronary artery disease?
Observational (n=262)
Does ultrasonography compared to soft X-ray radiography show diagnostic concordance for Achilles tendon thickening in patients with coronary artery disease?
Ultrasonography may diagnose more patients with Achilles tendon thickening than soft X-ray radiography, despite a significant correlation between the two methods.
Achilles tendon (AT) xanthomas are characteristic manifestations of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Although soft X-ray radiography (XR) and ultrasonography (US) are used to assess AT thickness, data comparing their diagnostic concordance are limited. We evaluated the correlation and diagnostic agreement between XR and US in measuring AT thickness in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. We prospectively enrolled CAD patients undergoing AT thickness measurement by XR and US between April 2024 and March 2025. AT thickening was defined according to the 2022 Japan Atherosclerosis Society guideline (XR: ≥8/7.5 mm [male/female], US: ≥ 6/5.5 mm [male/female]). Among 262 patients (14 [5.3%] clinically diagnosed FH), median AT thickness by XR was greater than that by US (7.0 [IQR 6.3–7.6] mm vs. 5.8 [IQR 5.1–6.1] mm, P < 0.001). XR and US measurements were significantly correlated ( r = 0.632, P < 0.001). The concordance rate for AT thickening was 83.2% and the discordance (16.8%) was primarily due to XR–/US+ cases (14.9%). In conclusion, although there was a significant correlation between XR and US for AT thickness measurement, discordance in the diagnosis of AT thickening was observed in 17% of patients. Physicians should be aware that US assessment may result in more patients diagnosed with AT thickening than XR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Itagaki et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=262). Ultrasonography vs. Soft X-ray radiography was evaluated on Achilles tendon thickness (r = 0.632, p=< 0.001). Ultrasonography assessment of Achilles tendon thickness yielded smaller median measurements than X-ray radiography (5.8 vs 7.0 mm, P<0.001) but diagnosed more cases of thickening.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: