PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 22, 2026The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America0 citations

Binaural sensitivity and processing of envelope-based interaural difference cues by bilateral cochlear implant users with perilingual and postlingual onset of deafness

View Full Paper
ZPZ. Ellen PengAKAlan KanRLRuth Y. Litovsky

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate binaural sensitivity and processing differences in cochlear implant users with perilingual and postlingual deafness.
  • Measured sensitivity to interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level difference (ILD) in BiCI users.
  • Used a custom acoustic complex for multi-channel stimulation and monitored eye gaze for decision-making analysis.
  • Compared performance between groups with perilingual and postlingual onset of deafness.
  • All BiCI users showed sensitivity to ILD.
  • 67% of perilingual and 78% of postlingual users demonstrated ITD sensitivity, with perilingual users showing poorer ITD sensitivity.
  • Faster decision-making correlated with improved accuracy for ILD processing, but faster ITD processing was noted only in postlingual users.

Abstract

Cochlear implants deliver binaural cues primarily in the signal envelope through two unsynchronized sound processors, presenting challenges to bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) users to (re)gain binaural hearing. Using a custom-designed acoustic complex to elicit multi-channel stimulation through the cochlear implant sound processors, this study measured sensitivity to interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level difference (ILD) using a discrimination task while concurrently tracking eye gaze positions to reveal decision-making delays during binaural processing. Two groups of BiCI users were tested with either perilingual or postlingual onset of deafness. Results show all BiCI users exhibited ILD sensitivity and a majority (67% of the perilingual and 78% of the postlingual) demonstrated ITD sensitivity, though those with perilingual onset showed higher (poorer) ITD sensitivity compared to postlingual users. Additionally, ILD processing at suprathreshold magnitudes led to faster decision making as accuracy increased for both groups. However, ITD processing was less salient, with faster ITD processing observed only in the postlingual group. These findings provide insights into the differences in binaural processing in users based on the timing of deafness onset.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Peng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e865476e0dea528dde9d5fhttps://doi.org/10.1121/10.0043466
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper